Category
Associated Location
No items found.
Share

CMAR Insights: Clearing Misconceptions + Clarifying Benefits

,
Erik Pingel + Arie Hoekstra, PE
February 24, 2026

Despite its growing popularity, misconceptions about Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) delivery still exist. Many assume it primarily benefits contractors, but the reality is far different. CMAR is designed to foster collaboration and prioritize transparency among owners, designers, and contractors, creating a win-win environment for all stakeholders.


Benefits for Each Stakeholder

Owners

  • Pre-bid predictability through a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)
  • Reduced financial risk
  • Schedule certainty
  • Gain a trusted advocate who helps align design decisions with budget and schedule goals


Design Teams

  • Constructability reviews during design to avoid conflicts later
  • Streamlined communication with the contractor for faster decision-making
  • Opportunity to integrate value engineering without compromising design intent


Contractors

  • Have clear roles and responsibilities, reducing adversarial relationships
  • Influence design for efficiency and cost savings
  • Chance to build trust and long-term partnerships earlier in the project


Process

STEP 1
Notice of Intent

Public owner posts notice of intent to required locations, making the public aware of the intent to enter a GMP contract for said project.

STEP 2
Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

Interested Construction Managers (CMs) submit credentials, past project performance, and project approach.

STEP 3
Shortlisting + Request for Proposals (RFP)

Qualified CMs are invited to submit detailed proposals on preconstruction plan, fee structure, schedule, and approach to cost control.

STEP 4
Evaluation + Interviews

Qualifying CMs are interviewed at the owner’s discretion. Selection is based on qualifications, proposed fees, schedule, and a CM’s overall ability to deliver value to the project. Selecting the lowest fee is not required, which is a critical difference from design-bid-build structures.

STEP 5
Preconstruction Agreement

The CM and the owner enter a preconstruction agreement. The CM supports design during cost estimation, value engineering, and constructability reviews.

STEP 6
Guaranteed Maximum Price Negotiation

Once design reaches an agreed upon milestone (e.g. 60, 90%), the CM proposes a GMP. If accepted, the CM assumes the financial risk for delivering the project at that price.

STEP 7
Bidding

In most states, the CM must prequalify all prime bidders wanting to bid on the project. This process may vary by CM and public entity and should include assessment of credentials, past performance, and capacity. Only those deemed qualified can submit a bid for any portion of the project.

STEP 8
Construction

CM manages construction and ensures GMP and schedule compliance.
‍

“CMAR creates win-win outcomes by bringing the contractor’s constructability, schedule, and cost insights into the design process. That collaboration, paired with full cost transparency, allows owners to make informed decisions, balance project priorities, and deliver stronger, more predictable outcomes.” – Sherri Leonard, Director of Collaborative Delivery for Rice Lake Construction


Real-World Example

Water Resource Recovery Facility | Hartford, SD

The Hartford Water Resource Recovery Facility project illustrates CMAR strengths in action. By involving the CM early, the team identified cost-saving opportunities without sacrificing quality or schedule. This collaborative approach resulted in zero change orders and returned nearly 50% of contingency funds back to the owner; a powerful demonstration of the value CMAR can deliver.

“The City first utilized the CMAR process when we erected our new wastewater treatment facility. Collaboration and planning with our engineer and CMAR right from the start of the project helped make it go well.” – Teresa Sidel, City Administrator of City of Hartford, SD


How to Choose the Right Delivery Model

Factors such as project size, schedule constraints, state regulations, and project priorities should guide the decision. Work closely with your trusted design partners to select the model that aligns with your goals.

This story was originally featured in our Volume 1, Issue 3 Municipal Matters newsletter. View the full newsletter here.

Blog Authors

Erik Pingel
Senior Project Manager
Erik.Pingel@ISGInc.com
515.243.9143
Arie Hoekstra, PE
Civil Engineer
Arie.Hoekstra@ISGInc.com
605.274.6401
No items found.
Erik Pingel + Arie Hoekstra, PE

Related Articles

Why the Best Solution Isn't Always the First One for Industrial Capital Planning

Discover how Front-End Engineering Design studies help industrial owners evaluate alternatives, reduce unnecessary costs, and make more confident capital investment decisions.

Industry Insights

2026 Western Energy Institute (WEI) Joint Use Conference Takeaways

Explore key takeaways from the 2026 WEI Joint Use Conference, including pole attachments, FCC rules, safety, and shared infrastructure.

Industry Insights

Form to Function: Designing Dealerships That Work

Discover how ISG designs dealerships that balance brand identity, customer experience, and operational efficiency—creating spaces that truly work for employees and clients.

Industry Insights

4 Benefits of Professional Facility Assessments

Is your facility prepared for what’s ahead? Learn how a professional assessment can uncover risks, establish priorities, and support informed long-term planning.

Industry Insights

2026 Iowa Water Conference Takeaways

The 2026 Iowa Water Conference highlighted the innovation, collaboration, and conservation efforts needed to advance Iowa's water future.

Industry Insights

The Safety System Beneath Every Substation

Discover how the hidden grounding system beneath every substation protects people, equipment, and reliable power delivery during faults and lightning events.

Industry Insights